Representing Clients Throughout California
No-Cost Consultations

Call or fill out the form below for a
no-cost consultation.

  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please enter a message.
    Please select an option.
Meet Our Attorneys

undefinedElizabeth Hopkins


Elizabeth Hopkins is a partner at Kantor & Kantor. After a long and fulfilling career at the United States Department of Labor, where she gained substantial experience working on pension, healthcare and other ERISA issues, she joined the firm in 2018. She represents clients who have been denied pension, healthcare, disability and life insurance benefits. She has practiced in the ERISA field since 1989 and is a passionate, knowledgeable and creative advocate for those who have been denied the employee benefits to which they are entitled.

Prior to joining Kantor & Kantor, Elizabeth worked for three decades at the Department of Labor, where she specialized in appellate litigation and ERISA. From 2002 through 2017, she headed the ERISA appellate and amicus program, where she oversaw nationwide litigation designed to advance the interests of workers and their families with regard to their employee benefits. She filed over 100 friend-of-the-court and party briefs and presented arguments in federal courts of appeals throughout the country and supervised others in doing so. She also participated in formulating departmental positions and briefing ERISA issues in the Supreme Court, where she worked on many of the important ERISA cases of the last two decades. In addition, she worked on a number of regulatory issues and court challenges to ERISA and Affordable Care Act regulations adopted by the Department of Labor. During her tenure at the Department of Labor she was a frequent speaker at ERISA conferences and bar-sponsored events, and taught numerous classes on ERISA topics and brief writing. She was also the recipient of many awards for her work on particular projects and cases, and was one of the first recipients of a prestigious annual award for brief writing.

Throughout her long career, Elizabeth has been motivated by the desire to help others and to fight for justice for individuals. In addition to her paid work, Elizabeth has been involved in many activities with the District of Columbia Bar and the American Bar Association. She is a member of American College of Employee Benefits Counsel, where she has served as a judge on their annual writing competition. She has been a contributing writer and editor on the American Bar Association’s, Employee Benefits Law, and has recently been appointed to serve on the Board of Senior Editors for that publication. Elizabeth is also a life-long volunteer for a wide range of organizations, from the Special Olympics, to a homeless shelter, to the Red Cross, to an after-school program at a Los Angeles public high school. Most recently, she traveled to Dilley, Texas to represent detained migrant women and their children claiming asylum.

Elizabeth is very excited to bring her skill and experience to representing clients at Kantor & Kantor with their ERISA claims.


  • California, 2018
  • District of Columbia, 1986
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California


  • Georgetown University Law Center, Washington D.C.
    J.D. -- 1986
    National Criminal Law Review
    Dean’s List

  • University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
    B.A. – 1983
    Major: English, with high distinction
    Phi Beta Kappa
    Four-year academic scholarship

Notable Cases

  • Dawson-Murdock v. Nat’l Counseling Grp., Inc., No. 18-1989, __F.3d__, 2019 WL 3308535 (4th Cir. July 24, 2019) (vacating the district court’s dismissal of the ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claims)
  • Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 134 S. Ct. 2459 (2014)
    (amicus brief successfully arguing for the elimination of a presumption adopted by numerous courts of appeals that investment in company stock is prudent)

  • Hardt v. Reliance Standard, 560 U.S. 242 (2010)
    (amicus brief successfully arguing for a more lenient standard for awards of attorney’s fees for plaintiff’s attorneys in ERISA cases)

  • MetLife v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105 (2008)
    (amicus brief successfully arguing for consideration of a fiduciary’s conflict by a court reviewing a benefit denial)

  • LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Assocs., 552 U.S. 248 (2008)
    (amicus brief successfully arguing that ERISA plan participant could sue for plan losses)

  • Unum Life Ins. Co. v. Ward, 526 U.S. 358 (2001)
    (amicus brief successfully arguing that ERISA does not preempt state insurance laws)

  • Harris Trust and Sav. Bank v. Salomon Smith Barney, 530 U.S. 238 (2000)
    (amicus brief successfully arguing that plan participants can sue those who knowingly participate in a fiduciary breach)

  • Osberg v. Foot Locker, 862 F.3d 198 (2d Cir. 2017)
    (amicus brief successfully arguing that statute of limitations was tolled and that plan participants could seek reformation as remedy for the fraudulent conversion of their pension plan)

  • Gearlds v. Entergy Services, Inc., 709 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2013)
    (successful amicus brief arguing that district court decision should be reversed and worker who was misinformed about insurance coverage should be allowed to sue fiduciary for resulting damages)

  • Cyr v. Reliance Standard, 624 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc)
    (successful amicus brief before the en banc Ninth Circuit that plan participants can sue insurance companies for benefits)

  • Solis v. Federal Employers Labor Relations Ass’n, 644 F.3d 221 (4th Cir. 2011)
    (successful brief defending district court decision that plan fiduciaries may not generally claim attorney client privilege in ERISA suits)

  • Vaughn v. Bay Environmental, 567 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2009)
    (one of a series of successful amicus briefs on the ability of a former employee to sue for benefits)

  • Johnson v. Couturier, 572 F.3d 10, 67 (9th Cir. 2007)
    (successful amicus brief limiting indemnification agreements)

  • Milofsky v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 442 F.3d 311 (5th Cir. 2006)
    (successful amicus brief and argument before the en banc Fifth Circuit, which vacated a panel decision and held that a breach of fiduciary suit need not benefit all pension plan participants)

  • LeBlanc v. Cahill, 153 F.3d 134 (4th Cir. 1998)
    (amicus brief successfully arguing that ERISA did not preempt a state law action for fraud against a non-fiduciary and that ERISA provides a cause of action against a third-party who knowingly participates in a fiduciary breach)

  • In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative ERISA Litig., 284 F. Supp. 2d 511 (S.D. Tex. 2003)
    (successful brief defeating motions to dismiss in massive ERISA lawsuit following the collapse of Enron; the case, brought by both private parties and the Department of Labor, ultimately settled for over $37,000,000)

What Sets Us Apart?

  • Free Case Consultations Provided
  • 160+ Years' Collective Experience
  • Thousands Of Cases Successfully Handled
  • You Don't Pay Us Unless We Recover Your Claim
  • Selected For Inclusion In The List Of Super Lawyers®

Client Testimonials

  • The arguments you made on our behalf at the mediation resulted in a more positive outcome for our case than we could have otherwise expected.

    “We appreciate that you found merit in our case, and that you were both willing and able to be present at the mediation. We believe that the arguments you made in our favor to the mediator were able to influence the outcome towards resolution that we could feel satisfied with. In the end, we believe that your counsel, your support, and the arguments you made on our behalf at the mediation resulted in a more positive outcome for our case than we could have otherwise expected. Throughout you were always professional, but direct and clearly firm on our position. We thank you for your efforts to resolve our dispute to our satisfaction, and wish you continued success.”

    Mara T.

  • I won the appeal.

    “Hi Glenn- This is a very belated thank you for your generous assistance and advice last summer, when I was appealing UBH's decision for my son. I won the appeal, at least for care at the partial hospitalization level (they wouldn't budge on residential, but the facility was accepting the partial care reimbursement for residential treatment). But the appeal was a great moral victory, and I think it's a great thing to have in the record, just in case he needs to go for treatment again. Thanks again for your generous help, I was very grateful for it. Wishing you a most happy Thanksgiving.”

    Terry S.

  • Truly outstanding in every way!

    “Both Glenn Kantor and his associate attorney Brent Brehm are truly experts in the field of disability law. They handled a complex individual disability policy issue for me. Their knowledge of the law, coupled with their experience, resources, and tactical skills, helped me obtain results that exceeded my expectations. Truly outstanding in every way!”


  • With you in my corner, I felt enabled and no longer alone.

    “Seemingly at the end of my rope with nowhere to turn, a friend suggested I call the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, who referred me to you. From our first contact I began to feel hope where there had been none. You took over all communication with the insurance company. You kept me posted as things progressed and advised me as to each necessary action. What a relief you were! With you in my corner, I felt enabled and no longer alone. Some big insurance companies feel emboldened to take arbitrary action against those who do not have the resources to defend what is rightfully theirs. Thank goodness for people like you who advocate for folks in need. In closing, please know how very much our association has meant. You have restored my faith in the goodness of people and renewed my confidence in the future. I am forever grateful.”

    Shirley G.

  • Thank you for being lawyers with a heart.

    “Thank you for being lawyers with a heart.”

    Miriam T.